Entitlements and livelihood restoration

A usable entitlement connects an affected interest to a remedy that someone can deliver. Specify the loss, recipient, calculation, responsible institution, funding, timing and evidence of completion. A broad category such as affected household cannot resolve the different interests of an owner, tenant, business operator and employee sharing the same location.

Recognize overlapping interests

This is a planning structure, not a universal entitlement schedule. Under World Bank ESS5, lack of a recognizable legal right to land does not remove every form of assistance: eligible people may have rights to non-land asset compensation and relevant relocation or livelihood measures. Their land entitlement differs from that of recognized owners and claimants. Apply the governing framework to each interest. World Bank ESS5

Test the matrix against actual cases before disclosure. One parcel can support several legitimate interests. Record those separately while checking that the same loss has not been compensated twice under different labels.

Make government and client responsibilities deliverable

A legal gap analysis needs an operational response. For each difference between national procedures and financier requirements, identify the affected group, supplementary measure, legal basis, approving authority, delivery organization, budget and verification. Stating that international standards prevail does not explain who can legally pay or provide the missing assistance.

Government-managed acquisition requires access to records and a feasible arrangement for gaps. IFC PS5 and GN5 describe collaboration and supplementary planning under their government-managed provisions. A client needs to establish what the agency will do and which additional measures the client can deliver. IFC PS5, paragraphs 30–32, IFC GN5

Put the agency, client, implementer, budget holder and readiness verifier into the same delivery agreement. Where the acquisition budget cannot cover an eligible interest, investigate an authorized supplementary mechanism. Resolve critical authority and funding gaps before relying on the public process in the construction schedule.

Test replacement cost in practice

Replacement cost needs a valuation method, date and evidence suited to the asset and market, including necessary transaction costs. Explain which items are included, how rates were established, and when they will be reviewed. Test whether people can actually obtain the replacement with the provision offered. World Bank ESS5

The following figures are assumed currency units for a teaching example:

A proposed payment of 850,000 leaves a 470,000 gap against these assumptions. Check that costs do not overlap, and assess moving or other assistance separately where it is not included. The figures are not a construction-cost benchmark.

For land, investigate soil, water, access, permitted use, tenure and productive potential. For perennial crops, consider the time needed to re-establish production when designing the associated package. For a business, distinguish turnover from net earnings and examine customer access and restart costs. A compensation rate cannot substitute for analysis of the function being lost.

Provide understandable calculations and a route to contest quantities, valuation methods and eligibility. These disputes require different evidence and may need different reviewers.

Assess the options behind a choice of cash

Cash gives flexibility only where suitable replacement resources and transactions are feasible. Investigate the available land or premises, secure transfer, costs, host claims and time until use can resume. A larger parcel may support a weaker livelihood if water, access or rights are inferior.

Ask whether people have informed alternatives. Acceptance of the only option presented does not establish a preference among viable choices. Assisted purchase, legal support and accessible payment arrangements may help people use compensation without arbitrarily limiting their control over it. FAO's tenure guidelines provide a wider basis for examining legitimate interests beyond formal registration. FAO tenure guidelines

Analyze supply at the scale of the program. A market that appears adequate for one household may not provide suitable replacements for many buyers at once. Monitor availability and prices during implementation.

Design livelihood restoration around feasible earnings

Start with the contribution lost, then test the resources and conditions needed for a replacement activity. Specify intended participants, market or resource, skills, inputs, transition period, provider, funding, outcomes and a fallback. Attendance and input distribution measure delivery; sustained net earnings, food production and secure resource access measure different outcomes. EBRD guidance, Reddy, Smyth and Steyn

For example, an assumed tailoring scheme for 50 displaced traders might fund machines and training. Its viability still depends on customers, prices, transport, childcare, working capital and competition. If only ten participants can reach a viable market, additional training does not resolve the missing demand. Test uncertain options while existing livelihoods remain available where feasible.

Occupational changes require a careful feasibility assessment. Capture fishing, aquaculture, farming, trade and wage work involve different resources, risks and skills. A temporary construction job cannot by itself replace a permanent activity. A loan creates repayment obligations and should not be counted as equivalent to a replacement productive asset.

Examine the distribution of assistance within a household. Identify each affected interest, the intended recipient and actual control over payments or replacement resources. Joint documentation can protect interests, but follow-up must still establish whether women and other members can use the package without coercion or additional unpaid burdens. IFC PS5, footnote 17

Fund the transition and operating arrangements

Base transition support on the actual interruption and restoration pathway. If premises take three months to secure and customers another four months to rebuild, a three-month allowance leaves a foreseeable gap under those assumptions. Define review points and fund extensions where warranted. Keep one-off compensation separate from sustainable earnings in the monitoring record.

Relocation sites need functioning services and manageable costs. Test housing, tenure, water, sanitation, transport, schools, health services, livelihood space and affordability. Agree host-community rights and capacity. Infrastructure handover should identify the receiving institution, staffing, recurrent funding, maintenance and interim responsibilities.

Where Indigenous Peoples are affected, determine the additional collective land, consultation and consent requirements. Individual compensation agreements do not establish the collective process required by the applicable PS7 or ESS7 provisions. Consider the specified return arrangements where relevant. IFC Performance Standards, PS7, World Bank ESS7 guidance

For temporary occupation, agree duration, access, interruption assistance and measurable reinstatement requirements. Physical return, usable land and secure rights are distinct tests. For pastoral livelihoods, connected routes, dry-season refuges, water and host relations can matter more than replacement hectares alone. Mining expansion also needs a cumulative record of successive acquisitions and restrictions. Owen and Kemp

Budget for recovery through completion

Build costs from quantities, unit rates, delivery schedules and responsible institutions. Include assets, relocation, livelihoods, transition, services, implementation, grievances, monitoring, completion review and identified uncertainties. Check for items already included in engineering or administration budgets.

Suppose quantities rise by 20 percent and rates by 15 percent. The affected cost line becomes 1.20 × 1.15 = 1.38 times its earlier estimate. Apply this 38 percent change to the relevant lines rather than assuming a flat contingency absorbs it. Distinguish uncertain quantities from omitted entitlements.

Tie cash availability to the activities that cause loss. An approved annual budget is insufficient if funds arrive after possession is scheduled. Retain money and responsibilities for follow-up and corrective action.

Compare historical costs only after aligning their scope, price year, geography, household denominator and implementation stage. The Nepal cost discussion develops these problems. Community investment and benefit sharing can strengthen outcomes, but retain a separate account of the remedies owed for particular losses.

Previous: Baseline evidence · Overview · Next: Implementation and recovery